Sponsored Ads:
|
callady10 May 13th, 2005, 01:54 AM I love this effect but don't know how it happened. I panned every other sot I took that day but this is the onyl one that came out this way, Any idea how I might have done this?
EXIF:
f5.6
1.60
ISO 400
No Flash
Zoom @ 160mm
yaya02 May 13th, 2005, 02:19 AM I am clueless, but it's pretty cool!
Dolphinraver May 13th, 2005, 02:25 AM That did turn pretty cool. Talk about showing motion.
ohenry May 13th, 2005, 02:35 AM Well, you can tell that you were panning, but probably not at the proper timing to freeze the biker. I like it, though!
darwin May 13th, 2005, 03:24 AM pretty cool.
Patman10 May 13th, 2005, 03:33 AM You were panting too fast, i mean panning!
William May 13th, 2005, 09:09 AM Nice, I saw this effect using flash during slow panning hey Cal maybe you've discovered a new technique.
callady10 May 13th, 2005, 06:38 PM hey Cal maybe you've discovered a new technique.
Yeah if only I knew how reproduce it LOL
Menard May 13th, 2005, 07:22 PM It looks like slow sync flash, but you were not using flash. Were there others around using flash? You may have had an unusual situation happen, but it does happen, where another photographer's flash, or even a strobe light, inadvertantly synched with your shutter.
kris10 May 13th, 2005, 10:01 PM Wow Cally. That is a great "motion" effect. Reproduce it so you can give it a new technique name and become rich and famous and publish all of us in your first book. :LOL:. Seriously though, panning is a neat effect to me and I love the effects you got with it in this shot!
callady10 May 14th, 2005, 01:39 AM Were there others around using flash
I don't think but even if they were do you think @ 160mm focal length would it have mattered in this shot?
Lensdude May 14th, 2005, 02:04 AM was the blur produced in camera or in photoshop?
Menard May 14th, 2005, 03:36 AM Were there others around using flash
I don't think but even if they were do you think @ 160mm focal length would it have mattered in this shot?
Yes. That would depend on the power of the flash, although at that distance, it seems unlikely that a handheld unit would be able to accomplish that. A stage strobe could put out enough power, but, considering the natural lighting conditions, it would seem unlikely that they would be using strobe lights.
Whatever the cause, it is both unusual and interesting.
callady10 May 14th, 2005, 04:17 AM was the blur produced in camera or in photoshop
In camera
|
Sponsored Ads:
|