Home · Search · Register  

Home » Member » Tim L. Walker » 2006 Photograph of the Year Galleries » 2006 Photograph of the Year - Final Round « Previous image · Slide Show · Next image »
« more ·
Round-1-Group-XI-Winner---Roaring-Fork-Cascade.jpg
<<
Round-1-Group-I-Winner---Vary-Berry.jpg
<
Round-1-Group-V-Winner---Savannah.jpg
·
Round-1-Group-XV-Winner---The-End.jpg
>
Round-1-Group-II-Winner---No-Escape.jpg
>>
· more »

2006 PotY - Final Round - Savannah
Click on image to view larger image

Photo Details
Tim L. Walker



SITE ADMIN

Registered: March 2004
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,818
users gallery
Title: Savannah
Username: Soopah
· Date: Thu January 25, 2007 · Views: 3534 · Filesize: 281.3kb, 209.2kb · Dimensions: 2048 x 986 ·
Additional Info
Rating: ******** 7.75
Keywords: photograph year 2006
BB Code:     
HTML code:     
Direct link:     
Print View


Author
Thread   Post A Reply  
ArtisticJS

Senior Member

Registered: January 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 139
Thu January 25, 2007 10:37pm Rating: 5.00 

Nice concept but execution is lacking. Highlights are completely blown out ... maybe next time? -J
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery   Report Post
cSoul

Senior Member

Registered: January 2007
Location: Middle of the Desert, New Mexico
Posts: 228
Fri January 26, 2007 7:10am Rating: 10.00 

That's strange, it looks far from blown on my CRT. It looks pretty bad on my laptop - but then, I learned long ago not to base anything on what images look like on a ****ty monitor. Live and learn, huh?

cSoul
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit cSoul's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery   Report Post
ArtisticJS

Senior Member

Registered: January 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 139
Sun January 28, 2007 9:23pm

Oops, just found out your not supposed to critique images here. However, if you were to measure the highlights, they come up as 255 in r, g, and b channels meaning there's no detail ... measuring in numerical values is the only guaranteed way to adjust your images so they are in-range. Hope this is helpful info. James
This user is offline
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery   Report Post
Soopah

Resident Meanie-Head

Registered: July 2004
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,436
Mon January 29, 2007 5:43pm Rating: 10.00 

You do realize that clouds are um... white, right? And that the sand is... white. Nice try though.
This user is online
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit Soopah's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery   Report Post


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.